Saturday, November 1, 2008

The candidate survey Jay doesn't want you to see



Read Jay Seegmiller's candidate survey where he confessed his true political agenda.





1. Jay supports recognizing same-sex unions.
Even though 71% of House District 49 voted for Constitutional Amendment 3 in 2004, which traditionally defined marriage as being between a man and a woman and allowed for no other recognition of gay marriage or union.


2. Jay supports legalizing the drug marijuana. He's admitted that he wants to legalize marijuana for "medicinal" purposes. It's part of a bigger agenda to legalize marijuana without restrictions.

And Mitt Romney agrees.

When asked about legalizing medical marijuana Mitt Romney said, "I believe that marijuana should be illegal in our country. It is the pathway to drug usage by our society, which is a great scourge, which is one of the great causes of crime in our cities...It's the wrong way to go. We need less drugs in our society not more drugs...I would oppose the legalization of marijuana in the country or legalization of marijuana for medicinal purposes because pain management is available from other sources."

Watch the video



3. Jay didn't support requiring parents to be notified by an abortion clinic before a minor had the unthinkable done. Moreover he didn't support prohibiting public funding for abortions either. Of course, once his issue position became better known he flip-flopped and devised an election-year excuse. Actually he's had made up two different excuses. First he said he forgot to answer the question. Then he said he purposely skipped the question. And the liberal media has been all too willing to give him a free-pass on his conflicting election-year excuses.


4. Jay wants to raise taxes. There's a hardly a tax he doesn't want to raise. He'll raise gas taxes, vehicle taxes, income taxes on 3 out of 4 homes in the district (those who make more than $75,000 per year), and capital gains taxes. He'll even raise taxes if you have too many dependents (although this one isn't on the candidate survey. It's on his own website where he says he supports the Jones-Mascaro bill of 2004, which gradually removes the federal credit you get for dependents on your state income taxes, and entirely eliminates the credit after just four dependents. A family of 5 would pay hundreds more each year than what they are currently paying.)